Corrections
Changes that could affect a reader's decision are logged here, with what changed and on what basis. Two entries so far; the latest is 7 October 2026, when we logged that the site now uses Google Analytics 4.
Not logged: typos, punctuation, formatting and link styling — repairs that do not change understanding.
Logged: rule wording, figures, conclusions, and anything that could lead a reader to a different decision. The process is in the editorial policy.
2026-10-07 · GA4
This site uses Google Analytics 4 (GA4) to measure page views and traffic sources. Page URLs, browser and device information are sent to Google, and analytics cookies may be set. We do not intentionally send names, email addresses, exchange account details or tool form inputs. Tool inputs are processed locally in your browser. You can restrict cookies in your browser or block analytics scripts. There are no user accounts or advertisements. See the Google Privacy Policy.
15 September 2026 · The real cost: the fee worked example
What changed: the "run one round end to end" section of the real cost of taking part, in the Chinese and Russian editions. This English edition never carried that worked example, so nothing on this page changed for you — we log it here because the same article carries our name in three languages.
What it used to say: if you bought BNB specifically for the round, a round trip cost "about 1.5%", so 20 BNB came to "over a hundred dollars" and a $25 reward could not cover it.
What it says now: the rates on Binance's public fee page when we checked it in September 2026 — 0.100% spot maker/taker for a regular user, 0.075% with the BNB discount — put a round trip at roughly 0.15% to 0.2% of the stake. The sum is: 20 BNB × BNB price × 0.15%–0.2%. At an illustrative BNB price of $750, that is $22.50 to $30, which eats most of that $25 reward rather than dwarfing it; put in the price on the day you trade to get your own figure. Binance revises these rates, so the fee shown on the order page when you place the trade is the one that applies.
Why: the old 1.5% was an estimate nobody checked against the fee page, and it inflated the fee line several times over. The conclusion holds — buying an asset purely to farm a round is usually a poor trade — but what makes it poor is the week of price risk, not the fees. Getting that backwards would send a reader's own arithmetic off by a wide margin. Source: Binance's fee overview page, checked September 2026.
Why there is nothing before that
The first batch of articles carries two publication dates: some are dated 27 August 2026 and the rest 29 August 2026; by 29 August all three language editions were live. The entry above is the first correction made after publication.
Worth saying explicitly, so this page does not read as an oversight: we do not log edits made before the site went public. Plenty changed before launch — wording was tightened, missing details were added, unclear paragraphs were rewritten. No reader ever saw those versions. Listing them as "corrections" would make this log look weightier than it is. The point of a corrections log is to admit that something already published was wrong, not to display effort.
The log grows as the rules change and as readers point things out, which is fine: a rules site that has never been wrong is not believable, because the rules change every month.
Tell us when something is wrong
The address is on contact. Reports of errors are the most welcome messages we get, and a screenshot or the URL of the official page you were looking at makes verification much faster. When we fix something we add a line here and write back to tell you what happened.